Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
Datos de
Investigación
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
    • TODO
  • Ayuda
    • Qué son y qué no son los Datos de Investigación
    • Cómo obtener un DOI/Handle
    • Cómo reutilizar y citar los Datos de Investigación
    • Preguntas frecuentes | FAQs
    • Contacto
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Acerca de
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • METADATOS
  • CONDICIONES DE USO
  • ARCHIVOS
  • ITEMS RELACIONADOS
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
 
Datos de investigación

Compensatory growth and inducible defenses in native and non-native dominant tree species from Northern Patagonia

Autores: Quintero, CarolinaIcon ; Paritsis, JuanIcon ; Sasal, YamilaIcon ; Reiner, Gabriela de Las NievesIcon ; Nuñez, Martin AndresIcon ; Dimarco, Romina DanielaIcon
Publicador: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Fecha de depósito: 28/04/2026
Fecha de creado: 10/4/2026-10/4/2026
Clasificación temática:
Ecología

Resumen

Invasive species often interact in novel ways affecting native ecosystems, but the role of herbivore-mediated plant responses to damage in such interactions remains understudied. We conducted a common garden experiment in northern Patagonia to assess the tolerance and resistance of native and non-native tree saplings - broadleaved and coniferous - to simulated browsing by introduced ungulates. Eight dominant species were subjected to mechanical clipping and sheep saliva application to mimic herbivory. We evaluated performance metrics, biomass allocation, leaf traits, induced chemical defenses, and subsequent leaf damage by insects in broadleaved species. Overall, plant responses to damage varied depending on whether the trees were native or non-native. In general, non-native broadleaved species exhibited strong compensatory regrowth, while native broadleaved species showed limited height recovery. However, broadleaved species showed less insect damage after simulated browsing, especially native ones, suggesting the induction of some defensive traits not evaluated here. In turn, non-native conifers showed reduced aboveground biomass but increased branch production and induced chemical defenses, including elevated levels of resin and monoterpenes, particularly γ-carene. In comparison, native conifers showed a conservative growth response and limited plasticity. Saliva application triggered specific defensive responses only in non-native species, suggesting evolved recognition of herbivore cues. These findings highlight distinct functional strategies: non-natives combined architectural plasticity with inducible defenses, while natives relied more on constitutive traits. Our results show that introduced ungulates may indirectly facilitate non-native tree invasion by differentially affecting native species recovery and defense, with implications for forest dynamics under ongoing invasion and co-invasion scenarios.

Información Técnica

Spreadsheet with all dependent variables measured at the beginning and end of the experiment per sample unit (10-12 individuals/Treatment x Species)

Métodos

This study investigated how native and non-native tree species respond to simulated herbivory, focusing on compensatory growth, biomass allocation, leaf traits, and induced chemical defenses. A common garden experiment was established in a shaded opening within a mixed forest dominated by Nothofagus dombeyi and Austrocedrus chilensis. Eight tree species were included: four native species (*N. dombeyi, N. pumilio, A. chilensis,* and *Araucaria araucana*) and four non-native or invasive species (*Pinus contorta murrayana, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Sorbus aucuparia,* and *Acer pseudoplatanus*). Thirty-six individuals per species were obtained, either from commercial nurseries (for most species) or collected from invaded urban areas (for *S. aucuparia* and *A. pseudoplatanus*). All saplings were approximately two years old and were transplanted into 2.5 L pots. They were randomly arranged on four raised benches within the garden and maintained under natural conditions with regular watering for nine months prior to treatment application. At the beginning of their third growing season (late December), saplings were assigned randomly to one of three treatments: (1) control (no damage), (2) mechanical damage (clipping), and (3) mechanical damage plus saliva application. Each treatment included 9–12 individuals per species. Herbivory was simulated by removing approximately 50% of the apical leaf area using pliers, mimicking browsing by large mammals. For the saliva treatment, approximately 330 µL of sheep (*Ovis aries*) saliva was applied directly to the wound immediately after clipping. Saliva was collected from domesticated sheep using a sponge-swabbing technique, stored frozen, and kept chilled during application. Before treatment, baseline measurements were taken for all saplings, including height, basal stem diameter (measured in two perpendicular directions), number of leaves, and number of lateral branches when present. These measurements were used to calculate an initial size index (d²h). The removed plant material from clipped individuals was collected, counted, and weighed both fresh and after drying to determine biomass loss. The experiment lasted approximately ten weeks. At its conclusion, plant performance was assessed by remeasuring height, basal diameter, leaf number, and branch number. Growth rate was calculated as the proportional increase in height, while leaf or branch production rate was determined based on changes in organ number. Aboveground biomass was measured by harvesting and separating leaves and stems, recording fresh weight, and determining dry weight after oven-drying. Root biomass was also assessed by carefully washing, drying, and weighing root systems. Leaf quality traits were evaluated to understand how herbivory influenced plant resource allocation. Specific leaf area (SLA), an indicator of leaf toughness, was calculated from leaf disks by dividing leaf area by dry mass. Lower SLA values correspond to tougher, more fibrous leaves. Leaf water content was determined from fresh and dry weights, and total foliar area was measured (for broadleaved species only) using digital image analysis of scanned leaves. Induced plant defenses were assessed by measuring secondary metabolites, which vary between plant functional groups. Total phenolic compounds were quantified in the leaves of broadleaved species using the Folin–Ciocalteu spectrophotometric method. Leaf samples were freeze-dried, ground, extracted in methanol, and analyzed for absorbance at 765 nm. Results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents per unit dry mass. For the two non-native conifer species (*P. contorta* and *P. menziesii*), chemical defenses were assessed through measurements of nonvolatile resins and monoterpenes. Resin content was determined gravimetrically by extracting plant tissues with hexane, evaporating the solvent, and weighing the residue. Monoterpene concentrations were measured by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after solvent extraction, using an internal standard for quantification. Key compounds identified included α-pinene, β-pinene, and γ-carene. Native conifers' chemical defenses were not assessed. Finally, the study evaluated the extent of subsequent herbivore or pathogen damage following treatments. Visual assessments were conducted to estimate the percentage of new leaf damage and classify the type of damage (e.g., chewing insects, miners, or fungal infection). This analysis was limited to broadleaved species, as conifers showed negligible visible damage. Overall, this experimental design allowed for a comprehensive comparison of how native and non-native tree species respond to simulated ungulate herbivory. By integrating growth, biomass, leaf traits, and chemical defenses, the study provides insight into species-specific tolerance and defense strategies.
Palabras clave: MECHANICAL DAMAGE, BROADLEAVED AND CONIFERS, SAPLINGS, UNGULATE SALIVA, OVERCOMPENSATION, INDUCED CHEMICAL DEFENSES, BIOMASS
Previsualización destacada
Identificador del recurso
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/286022
Colecciones
Datos de Investigación(CCT - PATAGONIA NORTE)
Datos de Investigación de CTRO.CIENTIFICO TECNOL.CONICET - PATAGONIA NORTE
Datos de Investigación(INIBIOMA)
Datos de Investigación de INST. DE INVEST.EN BIODIVERSIDAD Y MEDIOAMBIENTE
Citación
Quintero, Carolina; Paritsis, Juan; Sasal, Yamila; Reiner, Gabriela de Las Nieves; Nuñez, Martin Andres; Dimarco, Romina Daniela; (2026): Compensatory growth and inducible defenses in native and non-native dominant tree species from Northern Patagonia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. (dataset). http://hdl.handle.net/11336/286022
Condiciones de uso
Las buenas prácticas científicas esperan que se otorgue el crédito adecuado mediante una citación. Utilice un formato de citación y aplique estas normas de reutilización.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Compartir
Archivos del conjunto de datos
Archivo
Notas de uso
Tamaño
 
dataSet_complete.csv
Complete data set with all response variables per individual/species  Más
49.36Kb
  Descarga
 
 
Descargar todo
  Descargar solo metadatos (JSON)   Descargar solo metadatos (XML)
 
Preparando la descarga
 

Ver el registro completo

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades
  • Todo

Ayuda

  • Qué son y qué no son los Datos de Investigación
  • Cómo obtener un DOI/Handle
  • Cómo reutilizar y citar los Datos de Investigación
  • Preguntas frecuentes | FAQs
  • Contacto

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Acerca de

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES